This editorial introduces a special issue that dives into one of entrepreneurship’s trickiest puzzles: how do entrepreneurs make smart decisions when information is scarce, the future is hazy, and they're pulled in different directions by economic and non-economic goals? The authors propose a conceptual framework to understand how traits, team structures, and ownership setups shape how entrepreneurs navigate uncertainty and goal conflict—offering fresh insight for business owners, family firms, and researchers alike.
In a world full of unknowns—rapid tech changes, market shocks, and personal stakes—entrepreneurs face some of the most complex decisions in business. Unlike corporate managers, entrepreneurs often pursue not just profits but personal, social, or family goals. This editorial sheds light on how entrepreneurs reconcile these diverse aims while dealing with uncertainty that can't be easily predicted or calculated. The tension between unpredictable conditions and competing goals makes entrepreneurial decision-making a uniquely challenging endeavor—and one that is under-theorized in research.
This article serves as both a conceptual anchor and a preview of four empirical papers included in the special issue. It integrates decades of research and introduces a framework that connects:
The editorial draws on theories such as Knightian uncertainty, behavioral agency, attention-based views, and the mixed-gamble logic—especially relevant in family and hybrid ventures.
Entrepreneurs deal with Knightian uncertainty, where outcomes and probabilities are fundamentally unknowable. This calls for reliance on intuition, heuristics, and emotions—shaped by personality and social contexts. Even traits like birth order can affect risk preferences and CSR behaviors in family firms.
Entrepreneurs rarely pursue only profits. They also seek social, academic, or family-centered outcomes. These goals often compete—creating internal conflict that must be navigated through strategic prioritization.
Different decision-making structures (e.g., majority vote vs. unanimous consent) lead to different results depending on the environment's stability and the team’s goal diversity. Under fast-changing conditions, more consensus-driven approaches yield better results—especially when team members have divergent priorities.
Where entrepreneurs focus their limited attention—especially in early stages like crowdfunding—can make or break performance. Hybrid or portfolio entrepreneurs who divide their attention across multiple ventures often underperform because they can’t engage stakeholders effectively.
In academic spin-offs, the degree of academic ownership moderates how academic goals influence financial success. The relationship is not linear; instead, it depends on the level of emphasis and ownership balance.
This editorial bridges entrepreneurship and strategy by offering a holistic model of decision-making under uncertainty. It integrates behavioral and structural factors, clarifying why some ventures thrive while others falter under pressure. It opens space for research that’s more realistic—acknowledging that most entrepreneurs aren't just rational calculators, but human actors juggling multiple, shifting priorities.
For family businesses, this is especially crucial: emotional, identity-based, and dynastic goals sit alongside economic ones, and understanding how to manage this tension may be the difference between generational success and stagnation.
Chirico, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Kotlar, J., Cruz, C., Baù, M., Eddleston, K. A., Berrone, P., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2026). Entrepreneurial decision-making under uncertainty and competing goals. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.70013Note: This text has been generated with the support of AI and verified by the authors. For any question, please refer to the authors.